Webster Tarpley on The Global Warming Frauds
Written by admin on Eyl 10th, 2010 | Filed under: Articles
5 sene chat sohbet, chatsohbet, sohbet, sohbet odası, sohbet odaları aramalarında Google Türkiye'de en çok ziyaret edilen sitelerden biri olma gururuna siz ziyaretçilerimize daha kaliteli ve daha seviyeli chat sohbet hizmeti sağlayarak kavuşmuştur.
Sohbet odalarında iyi sohbetler.
25 Responses to “Webster Tarpley on The Global Warming Frauds”
Leave a Reply
it is all I had in those days….after all how much money did you pay for this quality and see how many ads I have on my site….?
Why the crap audio “quality” ?
Hi Paula, I think we’re talking at cross purposes, I have a video recording of the BBC coverage of the day’s events. It does however contain Stephen Evans’ original live phone call to the newsroom in which he makes absolutely no reference whatsoever to aeroplanes, – most odd given he was sitting in the lobby of one of the towers when the first of many explosions went off. Later the BBC replayed the call and introduced it by saying “Stephan Evans who was in the lobby when the first plane hit”
Do you live in NYC?
Hi Paula, yes, what format would you need? Would I be able to put it on a site as a file for you to download? It would be quite large.
you have footage from your own VCR that day? would you donate a copy to the Concordia Foundation? I am starting a collection….
Hi Paula, I know what you mean, it’s very difficult to sort out which video is authentic and which witness is genuine now that there’s been so much time for post production etc. I try and refer to my own T.V. recording of the day in question. I never ever saw evidence of real aeroplanes. But there is a question that I think needs to be focussed on; If it was planned, why are the graphics so badly done? Maybe the media wasn’t as complicit as is thought but may have had to cover something quickly.
For me building 7 is a problem as I got an eye witness account by a person I trust who saw this building blow UP (not following that picture of it coming down a la demolition).
Hi Paula, I think he would talk to any listening audience, he’s trying to get his message heard. He was on BBC T.V. at least 3 times a week for so many years then vanished. Now he’s revealed why. Pls look at BBC 5 website. (no affiliation with the BBC) Find a video called “Newton’s three laws of motion & WTC7″ The voiceovers are very, very significant people also dismissed by the BBC. Also, the most popular director general the BBC ever had (Greg Dyke) was sacked without explaination pre 9/11
good for David…..do you think he would call into a daily TV show in Manhattan?
Look for “David Bellamy” on youtube. He was the BBC expert botanist, environmentalist, and nature specialist for 35 years. He was sacked by the BBC because he refused to join in with the global warming scam. He has been blacklisted by all British tv channels and can now only get airtime on Irish and New Zealand TV where he is trying to get the truth heard.
You’re right . Here is the “complexity” .
YOUR MONEY into THEIR POCKETS !’
A one word sum up…TAXES ..
you are kidding!!! someone who understand permaculture is going for exhalations and farts being dangerous?
Can’t you call these ppl out?
Give me a number and I’ll try…
Here in the Netherlands, now Transition Towns are coming up and they are promoting the Climate Hoax of the IPCC, as the film “the age of stupid”
disturbing because many people of TT have lots of know how about permaculture etc
See the “Great Global Warming Swindle” for an assignation job on the “climate change” crowd.
An incidental spin-off to this fraud is that “Global Warming” (now “climate change”) is the litmus test filter I apply to invalidating prominent organisations who claim to be on the side of environmental protection.
They are not entirely foolish followers of fashion but people who are cynically in it for the spoils that going along with the lie will bring them either financially or politically.
Excellent comment about what this character appears to be trying to attempt.
You obviously have come across him before.
Before he tried diverting the issue to re-running 9-11he made the comment that
“CO2 is natural just as cianide and mercury are natural elements”
Atmospheric CO2 exchange (or breathing when it comes to land animals) is essential to the continued process of all life whereas cyanide or mercury would be lethal so this “natural” analogy is total nonsense.
Paula, now you are spreading the no plan theory, which is suspected to be smoke released by the CIA.
I agree with you, Rickdeckard. I am a huge fan of Tarpley, but we shall keep the disagreements on climate change issue. The real world mechanism between CO2 and climate change is very complex issue.
I agree with you. . I am a huge fan of Tarpley, but we shall keep the disagreements on climate change issue. The real world mechanism between CO2 and climate change is very complex issue
Well said Nathan. I support the climate change mitigation not because I am unaware of the scientific uncertainties, or the enormous political and economical interests behind these fanfares but despite them.
so, the people on the ground who witnessed the planes are cartoons as well?
grow up.
“meah…tooo long…. i already know its fake ”
ha-ha-ha!
meah…tooo long…. i already know its fake
Nice try Rickdeckard2020; try and stay on-point for a change, okay diddlehead?. The POINT is the FRAUD that CO2 FROM HUMANS is thee cause of “global warming.” No one with a brain falls for your adolescent diversion about pollution; no one is suggesting that pollution is good, ok dimwit? Save your circus diversion act for those that were born yesterday . . . got it?
check out “September clues”
thanks I will be taking a look